Guide provides a ten-step method for assessing evaluability in climate programmes, suggesting actionable steps.
This guide is written for evaluators, evaluation managers, and M&E advisers who need to decide whether — and how — to evaluate a climate or environmental programme. It assumes you are not starting from scratch: you have a programme file, a broad mandate, and a decision to make about evaluation scope and design. What it gives you: a ten-step method for diagnosing what a programme can credibly be evaluated for, a set of questions and warning signs for each step, a graded evaluability scoring tool, and explicit guidance on what to do with the findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johan G.L. Verheyden (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: