Review analyzes active flow control methods for improving aerodynamic performance in automotive systems, highlighting key implications.
Active flow control represents a key enabling technology for advancing aerodynamic performance, offering significant potential improvements in drag reduction, lift enhancement, and overall efficiency. This paper reviews state-of-the-art active flow control techniques originally developed for aerospace applications and evaluates their applicability to automotive systems, considering constraints such as packaging, efficiency, cost, and integration. A structured classification of fluidic, surface-based (including morphing), and plasma-based approaches is presented, followed by a comparative and decision-oriented assessment of their performance, technological maturity, and feasibility. The results indicate that synthetic jet actuators and morphing-based solutions provide the most balanced compromise between aerodynamic effectiveness and practical implementation. In contrast, conventional fluidic methods are limited by low system efficiency, while plasma-based techniques, although highly responsive, face challenges related to scalability and integration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herberg et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: