PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration2 citations

Leading Change: A Systematic Review of Formative Versus Reflective Culture Scales of Innovation and Innovativeness

View Full Paper
MJM. Lindell JosephMWMichele Williams

Key Points

  • This review explores the differences between formative and reflective measures in healthcare research, particularly in nursing.
  • Conducted a systematic review of existing literature on formative and reflective scales.
  • Analyzed the implications of different measurement choices on nursing outcomes and contributions.
  • Identified key gaps in understanding the impact of measurement types on nursing practice changes.
  • Highlighted the importance of selecting appropriate measures for demonstrating nursing's economic contribution.

Abstract

The authors posit that the distinction between formative and reflective measures in healthcare research has not been adequately explored. As researchers examine how to demonstrate the value and impact of nursing, it is important to recognize that selecting the right measures is essential for substantiating nursing's economic contribution and for supporting safe, evidence-based practice changes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Joseph et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b6088ba6daa22dacf18https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000001720
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper