Demonstrates that inhibiting miR-99b-5p induces apoptosis in triple-negative breast cancer, suggesting a new treatment approach.
Background Dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) are critical contributors to breast cancer biology, yet the functional roles of many remain incompletely understood. miR-99b-5p has been widely characterized as a tumor-suppressive miRNA in numerous cancer types, where its expression is consistently reduced in tumors compared with normal tissues. In contrast, our analyses of breast cancer datasets revealed a unique expression pattern: miR-99b-5p is significantly upregulated in breast tumors, suggesting a context-dependent oncogenic function. In this study, we identified miR-99b-5p as an oncogenic driver in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Methods and results TCGA-based expression profiling confirmed its elevated levels in breast tumors. Functional assays demonstrated that downregulation of miR-99b-5p in TNBC cells inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis, indicating a critical role in sustaining tumor cell survival. To elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying this activity, we performed AGO2-RNA immunoprecipitation followed by high-throughput sequencing (AGO2-RIP-Seq), enabling unbiased identification of miR-99b-5p-associated transcripts. Pathway enrichment analyses revealed that its direct targets converge on apoptotic regulation, cell-cycle control, and ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation. Mechanistic validation through qRT-PCR, Western blotting, and luciferase assays confirmed that miR-99b-5p modulates the TRAIL-R signaling pathway via DR5 and BAK, attenuating apoptotic signaling. In vivo studies using xenograft models established with MDA-MB-231 cells stably expressing miR-99b-5p knockdown showed marked tumor regression, further supporting its oncogenic role. Conclusion Collectively, these findings establish miR-99b-5p as a context-specific oncogenic miRNA in breast cancer and a promising therapeutic target, particularly for TNBC, where targeted treatment options remain limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noyan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: