Review highlights the roles of LEM-domain proteins in cancer, indicating their potential as biomarkers for therapies.
Nuclear envelope dysfunction is increasingly recognized as a driver of cancer-associated alterations in chromatin organization, genome stability, and mechanotransduction. Among inner nuclear membrane components are the LEM-domain (LEM-D) proteins LAP2/TMPO, emerin (EMD), LEMD1, LEMD2, MAN1/LEMD3, ANKLE1, and ANKLE2. Accumulating evidence links dysregulation of these proteins to hallmark cancer processes, including cell-cycle control, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, genome instability, and therapeutic resistance. This review synthesizes recent mechanistic and translational findings on LEM-D proteins in cancer, highlighting isoform-specific functions, context-dependent oncogenic versus tumor-suppressive roles, and convergence on key pathways such as Wnt/β-catenin, PI3K/AKT, MAPK, and TGF-β signaling. Concrete evidence for prognostic value varies across the LEM-D proteins. While much of the current evidence derives from transcript-level and preclinical studies, emerging data suggest that LEM-D proteins contribute to nuclear stress adaptation and may represent context-dependent therapeutic vulnerabilities. We discuss their prognostic and predictive potential, critically evaluate limitations in current datasets, and present a unifying framework linking LEM-D dysfunction to genome instability, altered signalling, and therapy resistance. Thus, despite growing evidence of therapeutic potential, these proteins are better positioned as biomarkers to guide current therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jobe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: