Survey study assesses medical students' attitudes towards sub-internship and residency applications, revealing key insights about program selection.
Introduction. Since COVID-19, limited research has examined the residency application and sub-internship process from the perspective of medical students. Understanding these perspectives may benefit both residency programs and applicants. This study aimed to assess attitudes and perceptions related to clinical sub-internship experiences in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Methods. This cross-sectional, web-based survey was administered to fourth-year medical students completing an Obstetrics and Gynecology sub-internship at a single teaching institution during one academic year. Survey themes included demographics, career goals, perspectives on sub-internships, and views on the residency application process. Results. We received 11 completed surveys (64.7% response rate). All participants were 25-30 years old. Most participants were female (81.8%, n = 9), White (81.8%, n = 9), and allopathic applicants (72.7%, n = 8). The most commonly identified priority in selecting a residency program was program culture (45.5%, n = 5). Respondents reported that the most important goals of a sub-internship were exposure to residency culture to assess fit (36.4%, n = 4) and functioning as an acting intern for audition purposes (36.4%, n = 4). Situational awareness (90.9%, n = 10) and integrating well with residents and hospital staff (90.9%, n = 10) were considered the most important traits of a successful sub-intern. Participants identified the personal statement as the most important element of their residency application (72.7%, n = 8). Many also expressed a preference for in-person interview activities (54.5%, n = 6). Conclusions. Medical student sub-interns highly valued program culture and used sub-internships to assess program fit. This study is limited by its small sample size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Longabaugh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: