Mechanistic studies reveal significant kinetic effects in C–H amination reactions using iron catalysts, suggesting implications for efficient hydrocarbon functionalization.
The conversion of C–H bonds into amines by nitrene insertion is an attractive transformation since it is both atom- and step-economical, and provides a direct route to functionalizing hydrocarbons. Using an iron catalyst [{(tBupyrr)2pyr}Fe(OEt2)] (1-OEt2) ((tBupyrr)2pyr2– = 3,5-tBu2-bis(pyrrolyl)pyridine), we recently demonstrated the catalytic conversion of weak C–H bonds into secondary amines using aryl azides as the nitrene source [Zars, E.; Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202311749]. Here, we describe detailed mechanistic studies of this intermolecular C–H amination reaction under catalytic conditions. We find by Variable Time Normalization Analysis (VTNA) that the conversion of xanthene (2-H2) and 2,4,6-trimethyl-phenyl azide (Me3) catalyzed by 1-OEt2 is an overall 3/2 order process, being 1st order in 2-H2 and half order in Me3. A kinetic isotope effect study (KIE) using 2-d2 results in a significant decrease in the rate (KIE = 61(15)), which clearly implicates the C–H insertion step as rate-determining. Furthermore, treatment of 1-OEt2 with one equivalent of N3-2,6-iPr2–C6H3 yields the mixed-valence C–N coupled product [(tBupyrr)2pyrFe-N═C(2,6iPr2–Ph)═N-(2,6iPr2–Ph))FetBupyrrpyr(2-H-pyrr)] (5iPr). Quantum chemical calculations confirm the electronic structure of the mixed-valence dimer in 5iPr and rationalize the Hammett correlation by a delicate balance in the dinuclearization of the catalytically active monomers. Calculations further indicate significant tunneling for the pivotal H atom abstraction by the iron-imidyl complex. Combining all these results allows us to propose a mechanism consisting of imido formation in equilibrium with a radical-coupled diiron system, followed by stepwise C–H insertion via a linear H atom abstraction transition state and subsequent radical rebound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zars et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: