Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective case-control study evaluates ALU-PH index's predictive ability for preeclampsia in pregnancies, suggesting further validation needed.
To evaluate the association between the first-trimester ALU-PH index, calculated from routinely available laboratory parameters, and the subsequent development of preeclampsia. This retrospective case-control study included 206 singleton pregnancies followed at a tertiary referral center between January 2020 and December 2024. The study population comprised 98 women who subsequently developed preeclampsia and 108 normotensive controls. First-trimester laboratory parameters obtained between 11 and 13 + 6 weeks of gestation were used to calculate the ALU-PH index according to the formula: (AST × LDH × BUN) / (platelet × hemoglobin). Demographic, obstetric, and laboratory variables were compared between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the discriminatory performance of the ALU-PH index for predicting preeclampsia. Gestational age at delivery was significantly lower and 24-hour urinary protein excretion was significantly higher in the preeclampsia group than in the control group (both p < 0.001). Among first-trimester laboratory parameters, AST levels were significantly higher in women who subsequently developed preeclampsia (18.26 ± 10.69 vs. 15.10 ± 7.31 U/L, p = 0.003), whereas the ALU-PH index was significantly lower in this group (15.46 ± 17.94 vs. 18.35 ± 17.00, p = 0.015). No significant differences were observed for maternal age, gravida, parity, BUN, LDH, platelet count, or hemoglobin levels. In ROC analysis, the ALU-PH index showed weak but statistically significant discriminatory performance for predicting preeclampsia, with an AUC of 0.598, sensitivity of 60.2%, specificity of 57.4%, and a cut-off value of 12.25. The first-trimester ALU-PH index was significantly associated with subsequent preeclampsia; however, its discriminatory performance was weak and insufficient for standalone clinical use. The ALU-PH index may be considered an exploratory, low-cost adjunct marker, but prospective validation in larger and phenotype-stratified cohorts is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çıtırke et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: