Why the study?
It was unknown whether there are structural differences between patients with no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease with ischemia (INOCA) and those without ischemia (ANOCA).
Does seismocardiography correlate with echocardiography for cardiac cycle timing markers, and are there structural differences between ANOCA and INOCA?
Cohort (n=177)
Does seismocardiography correlate with echocardiography for cardiac cycle timing markers, and are there structural differences between ANOCA and INOCA?
Absolute Event Rate: 71.7% vs 66.5%
p-value: p=0.035
Seismocardiography strongly correlates with echocardiography for cardiac cycle timing, and ANOCA patients exhibit an early HFpEF-like remodeling phenotype compared to INOCA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in No evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) (n=177). ANOCA (NOCAD without ischemia) vs. INOCA (NOCAD with ischemia) was evaluated on Left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (p=0.035).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: