Analytical cross-sectional study reports cytopenia frequency in hepatitis C therapy patients, highlighting treatment effects.
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to determine the frequency of cytopenias among patients receiving hepatitis C therapy and to examine their relationship with different treatment regimens METHODOLOGY This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted over six months (May-October 2024) at the Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar. A total of 113 patients aged 20-70 years with chronic hepatitis C receiving antiviral therapy were included using consecutive sampling. Data were collected at the 12-week follow-up. Hematological parameters and sustained virological response (SVR) were assessed. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Chi-square test, Cramer’s V, and multivariate logistic regression were applied. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTSThe mean age of participants was 40.1 ± 9.0 years, with a male predominance (55.8%). The overall SVR rate was 80.5%, with the highest response observed in patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (90.8%; 95% CI: 82.1-96.2). Cytopenias were observed in a considerable proportion of patients, with anemia being the most common (23.9%; 95% CI: 16.1-31.7), followed by Thrombocytopenia (9.7%), leukopenia (8.8%), and pancytopenia (6.2%). A statistically significant association was found between treatment regimen and cytopenias (p < 0.001), with a strong effect size for anemia (Cramer’s V = 0.768). Multivariate analysis identified treatment regimen as the only independent predictor of anemia. Patients receiving sofosbuvir/velpatasvir had significantly lower odds of anemia than those receiving conventional therapy (AOR = 0.006; 95% CI: 0.001-0.054; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Direct-acting antiviral therapy, particularly sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, is associated with high virological response and a lower frequency of cytopenias. However, given the observational design, findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further multicenter studies are recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: