Proposes a mechanism explaining why dysfunctional norms persist in governance, suggesting implications for political dynamics.
Evolutionary theories of norms converge on two explanations for their origin and persistence: the adaptation-for-cooperation hypothesis (Boyd, Richerson, Henrich) and the uncertainty-reduction hypothesis (Sterelny and Brusse, 2026). Both accounts leave open a specific explanatory gap: why do patently dysfunctional norms, ones whose costs are visible to all actors, remain entrenched across multiple governmental cycles rather than being corrected? This paper proposes a mechanism that closes that gap. I argue that structurally unenforceable norms, those whose compliance is technically or economically impossible for the regulated population, evolve a secondary function through a process of cultural exaptation: they systematically suppress the political voice of regulated agents who are permanently in violation. I term this the Lateral Silencing Exaptation (LSE). The mechanism operates as follows: chronic non-compliance generates a standing vulnerability to discretionary enforcement; that vulnerability imposes an asymmetric cost on protest or political demand; rational agents therefore reduce or suppress regulatory contestation even on matters unrelated to the original norm. The paper develops a two-case typology: intentional LSE, where the silencing function is selected by design or by deliberate tolerance (illustrated by the Georgian regulatory apparatus under Eduard Shevardnadze, 1992-2003); and emergent LSE, where silencing arises as an unselected byproduct of overcomplexity, subsequently coopted as a governance resource (illustrated by Argentina's dual-control environmental and tax regulatory regimes). I formalize the transition from bug to feature using an evolutionary game theory framework: once a regulatory actor observes the silencing effect, the expected payoff from maintaining the dysfunctional norm strictly dominates that from correcting it, locking the norm into a durable equilibrium. This is precisely the Zombie Law Equilibrium described in prior work in this research program (Lerer, 2025; DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18943464). The paper integrates three bodies of literature that have not been connected: the theory of exaptation in institutional evolution (Gould and Vrba, 1982; as applied in Lerer, 2026); the political economy of extractive institutions (Acemoglu and Robinson, 2012); and the evolutionary theory of norm persistence under social opacity (Sterelny and Brusse, 2026). Falsifiable predictions are provided.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ignacio Adrián LERER (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: