PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases0 citationsOpen Access

TREAT-NMD advisory committee for therapeutics: Preclinical and clinical learnings from 15 years of TACT

View Full Paper
AAAnnemieke Aartsma-RusLRLaura RobertsonLALindsay N. Alfano

Key Points

  • The objective is to summarize the evolution of TACT and highlight common mistakes in drug development for neuromuscular diseases.
  • Reviewed 90 applications (68 Industry, 22 Academia) from 2009-2024.
  • Identified recurrent mistakes in preclinical and clinical trial designs.
  • Provided expert advice to help improve therapy development.
  • Outlined key errors such as inadequate information in preclinical studies.
  • Emphasized the importance of including wild type references in animal studies.
  • Highlighted issues with selecting appropriate outcome measures in clinical trials.

Abstract

The TREAT-NMD Advisory Committee for Therapeutics (TACT) provides academic and industry applicants involved in therapy development in the neuromuscular disease (NMD) space with constructive, multidisciplinary expert advice in order to help derisk NMD drug development and avoid potential therapies entering clinical trials prematurely and to improve trial design. The ultimate goal of TACT is to reduce the risk of type 1 errors (concluding a treatment is effective, while it is not), type 2 errors (concluding a treatment is not effective, while it is), or risks of questions and regulatory rejections later on in development.TACT celebrated its 15th birthday in 2024. From 2009-2024 TACT reviewed 90 applications, 68 from Industry and 22 from Academia. This perspective paper summarizes how TACT has evolved from its initiation. Furthermore, based on our experience, we list recurrent mistakes, such as not collecting sufficient information in pre-clinical studies, omitting wild type references in animal studies and choosing the wrong or too many outcome measures in clinical trials. By sharing common errors in preclinical and clinical trial design and providing lessons learned we aim to further improve therapy development in the NMD space.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aartsma-Rus et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac074a46254e215b3cbdhttps://doi.org/10.1177/22143602261438534
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Natural disease history of mouse models for limb girdle muscular dystrophy types 2D and 2F2017 · 24 citations
  2. 2Functional trajectories before and after loss of ambulation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy and implications for clinical trials2024 · 13 citations
  3. 3Update on Standard Operating Procedures in Preclinical Research for DMD and SMA Report of TREAT-NMD Alliance Workshop, Schiphol Airport, 26 April 2015, The Netherlands2018 · 14 citations
  4. 4Report of the multistakeholder drug development round table meeting of the World Duchenne Organization focusing on challenges for clinical development of therapies2025 · 1 citations
  5. 5Natural disease history of the D2‐mdx mouse model for Duchenne muscular dystrophy2019 · 163 citations