Study evaluating antibacterial and physical properties of graphene oxide modified sealants, suggesting improved dental material performance.
This study evaluated the influence of incorporating graphene oxide (GO) nanoparticles (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 wt%) into resin-based pit and fissure sealants on their mechanical, physical, antibacterial, and cytocompatible properties, compared with a commercial reference material. Experimental sealants containing GO (G2–G4) were prepared, with an unmodified resin as control (G1) and Helioseal F Plus as commercial comparison (G5). GO morphology was characterized by TEM. Specimens (n = 240) were tested for Vickers microhardness, viscosity, surface roughness change (ΔRa) after simulated toothbrushing, and fluorescence (% blue channel). Antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans was assessed using a direct contact test (ASTM E2180), and antibacterial rate (AR) was calculated. Cytotoxicity was evaluated via MTT assay with human gingival fibroblasts following ISO 10993-5. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). GO incorporation significantly increased microhardness, with G4 (0.5 wt% GO) showing the highest VHN (p < 0.05). Viscosity rose modestly with GO content, while the commercial sealant exhibited the highest value. G3 (0.25 wt% GO) displayed the lowest ΔRa after brushing. All GO groups showed higher fluorescence than the control (p < 0.05). Antibacterial activity increased with GO concentration (AR = 83.84–88.88%), though G5 achieved the highest AR (99.42%). All formulations maintained > 70% cell viability, confirming acceptable biocompatibility. Low-level GO reinforcement enhanced surface hardness, wear resistance, fluorescence, and antibacterial performance of resin-based sealants without compromising cytocompatibility. GO represents a promising multifunctional nanofiller for next-generation sealants aimed at improving durability and caries prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraisintu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: