Retrospective study examines carpal fractures, their causes, treatment, and complications in a specific population, indicating notable patterns.
Carpal fractures are uncommon, representing a small proportion of hand fractures. This study aimed to determine the incidence, injury mechanisms, treatment patterns, and complication rates of carpal fractures in Olmsted County, Minnesota, United States. A retrospective review was performed using the Rochester Epidemiology Project registry to identify carpal fractures between 2013 and 2023. Fractures were confirmed by radiographs, computed tomography, or radiology reports. Demographic data, injury mechanism, fracture laterality, and fracture characteristics were recorded. A total of 699 carpal fractures were identified. Most patients were men (57%) with a mean age of 43 years. The most common fracture was the scaphoid (44%), followed by the triquetrum (31%), hamate (9%), and trapezium (3%). The overall incidence was 53.6 per 100,000 person-years. Concomitant wrist fractures occurred in 22%, and multiple ipsilateral carpal fractures in 4.6%. Patients with triquetrum fractures had the highest mean age (54 years) and low surgical rates (2%), whereas hamate and trapezoid fractures occurred at younger ages (39 and 38 years) and had the highest surgical rates (28 and 33%, respectively). The most common injury mechanism was a fall onto an outstretched hand (n = 438). Overall, 14% (n = 98) of patients underwent surgery, of whom 77% were men. The highest nonunion rate was seen in hamate fractures (10.9%), followed by scaphoid waist and proximal pole fractures (10.5%). Nonscaphoid carpal fractures occur more frequently than previously reported and demonstrate variable age distribution, treatment rates, and nonunion risks. Understanding these patterns can improve diagnosis, guide treatment planning, and inform patient expectations. IV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tunaboylu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: