Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review examines neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy for MSI-H/dMMR early colorectal cancer, suggesting clinical implications.
The management of early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) is undergoing a paradigm shift driven by advances in immunotherapy, particularly for tumors characterized by microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Representing approximately 15% of non-metastatic CRC, this biologically distinct subgroup is intrinsically resistant to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy yet uniquely sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibition. This review critically examines the emerging evidence supporting neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy strategies in early-stage MSI-H/dMMR colon cancer, drawing on data from FOxTROT, NICHE-2, and ATOMIC. We argue that neoadjuvant immunotherapy is biologically more rational, clinically effective, and value-conscious—particularly relevant in resource-limited settings—while acknowledging that definitive practice change will require randomized comparative trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: