Compares dehumidification methods for biological samples to enhance e-nose analysis, indicating effective systems.
It is well known that gas sensor responses are affected by the presence of humidity in the analyzed gas. This is particularly true when dealing with biological fluid samples, whose high moisture content interferes with the adsorption of the trace volatile organic compounds (VOCs) on the sensors’ active layer. To address this challenge, this study focuses on designing and testing a novel sampling system for the dehumidification of biological fluid headspace to be characterized by an electronic nose (e-Nose). Such a system, based on the use of disposable polymeric sampling bags purged with dry air, exploits the polymers’ permeability to water vapor to reduce sample humidity. Tested materials included NalophanTM (20 μm), high-density polyethylene (HDPE, 8, 9, 10 and 11 μm), low-density polyethylene (LDPE, 12 and 50 μm), and biodegradable polyester (Bio-PS, 15 μm). First, dehumidification performance was characterized as a function of dry air flow rate and film type. A purge of 1 L/min accelerated the sample humidity removal compared to passive storage of bags from >2 h to <1 h (from 80% to 20% RH). Second, a mass-balance model was applied to dedicated experiments to decouple water losses due to diffusion and adsorption, showing that diffusion through the polymer wall dominates, while adsorption occurs in the early stages of conditioning. Third, because these materials are not selectively permeable to water, potential loss of water-soluble VOCs during dehumidification was investigated. Pooled urine headspace samples—both raw and spiked with a metabolite mix of VOCs—were dried using each material and analyzed using a photo-ionization detector (PID) and an e-Nose. Results were compared against a NafionTM dryer. Comparison was based on the e-Nose’s ability to discriminate between pooled vs. spiked samples and reveal real-life metabolomic changes. NalophanTM bags and NafionTM dryer provided the highest VOC fingerprint to support discrimination by the e-Nose, while Bio-PS provided the fastest sample dehumidification. The proposed bag-based system offers a cost-effective, disposable, and contamination-free solution to humidity interference in e-Noses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tischer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: