PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Behavioral Sciences & the Law0 citationsOpen Access

Differences in Immediate and Delayed Suggestibility Among Children With Dyslexia and Controls

View Full Paper
GGGisli GudjonssonVGValeria GiostraMVMonia Vagni

Key Points

  • This study investigates how dyslexia affects suggestibility in children and the role of verbal recall in this relationship.
  • Participants included 95 children with dyslexia and 109 control children.
  • All participants completed the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2) and various Word Tasks.
  • Assessments were conducted over two time points, one week apart.
  • Children with dyslexia showed a different pattern of immediate and delayed suggestibility compared to controls.
  • Poor verbal recall significantly mediated the relationship between dyslexia and suggestibility.
  • Difficulties in identifying implausible stories further contributed to suggestibility in children with dyslexia.

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between dyslexia and suggestibility in children, and the extent to which this relationship is accounted for by performance on Word Tasks. Participants comprised 95 children with dyslexia and 109 controls. All participants completed the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale (GSS 2), which measures immediate and delayed suggestibility 1 week apart, five different Word Tasks, and a test of non-verbal intelligence. Overall, the findings indicate a nuanced relationship between dyslexia and different components of suggestibility as measured by the GSS 2. This relationship is substantially mediated by poor verbal recall and difficulties in identifying absurd or implausible story content. This represents a novel contribution to scientific literature. The implications for interview practice are significant: special caution is required when interviewing children with "pure" dyslexia, as the absence of co-morbid neurodevelopmental conditions does not preclude vulnerability during investigative interviewing or witness testimony.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gudjonsson et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edacbd4a46254e215b4740https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.70061
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Specific Learning Disorder: Prevalence and Gender Differences2014 · 381 citations
  2. 2Does the use of dolls facilitate children's memory of visits to the doctor?1993 · 106 citations
  3. 3Generalizability of a two-factor measure of young children's suggestibility in Norway and the USA2005 · 14 citations
  4. 4Young Children's Difficulty with Indirect Speech Acts: Implications for Questioning Child Witnesses2014 · 37 citations
  5. 5Difficulties in auditory organisation as a possible cause of reading backwardness1978 · 783 citations