Explores emotional conflict and dysregulation through Hegelian dialectics, suggesting implications for therapeutic interventions.
This paper explores emotional conflict and dysregulation through the lens of Hegelian dialectics, drawing on the philosophical framework of Georg Hegel to conceptualize emotions as dynamic, evolving processes rather than static states. Central to this perspective is the dialectical movement of thesis, antithesis, and synthesis, through which conflicting emotional experiences are reconciled to achieve higher levels of self-consciousness and integration. The paper examines four key Hegelian concepts - dialectical process, self-consciousness, emotional dysregulation, and the development of spirit (Geist) - to illustrate how emotions contribute to both individual and collective development. Emotional dysregulation is interpreted as a disruption in this dialectical progression, resulting in an inability to integrate opposing emotional states and leading to maladaptive behaviors and psychological distress. By presenting emotional experiences as existing along dialectical continua (e.g., love/hate, joy/sadness, fear/excitement), the study highlights the complexity and fluidity of affective life. The paper further underscores the importance of social recognition and relational validation in achieving emotional synthesis and regulation. Ultimately, it argues that fostering awareness of the dialectical nature of emotions can inform therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing emotional integration, resilience, and mental well-being.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kok Hwee Chia (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: