Essay examines how algorithmic mediation affects subjectivity and genuine human connections, suggesting notable implications.
This essay examines the ontological limits of algorithmic mediation in the constitution of contemporary subjectivity. Drawing on the critiques of Han (2015, 2022), Zuboff (2019), and Turkle (2011), and grounded in the phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty (1945) and the enactivism of Di Paolo (2005) and Fuchs and De Jaegher (2009), the central argument holds that technical hyperconnectivity quantitatively expands contact between subjects while qualitatively emptying the shared vulnerability that constitutes the condition of possibility for genuine human bonds. It is proposed that algorithmically mediated presence produces a structural illusion: the subject experiences connection without genuine exposure, proximity without risk, and communication without encounter. The implications for psychological clinical practice, philosophy of mind, and the understanding of contemporary suffering are discussed throughout the text.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matheus Vinicius Duarte de Souza (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: