Investigates damage effects of lightning strikes on fuel tank covers, highlighting safety concerns.
Fuel vapor can be ignited by lightning through various means, particularly through hot spot formation on fuel tank skins. The wing fuel tank cover and its surrounding outer plates together form part of the aerodynamic shape of an aircraft. The lightning protection design of the fuel system, including wing fuel tank, is of great significance for ensuring the aircraft safety. Based on the Joule heating and implosion effect, the damage response of a composite fuel tank cover subjected to lightning strikes is analyzed in this paper. The adopted method combines electrical–thermal coupling with explicit dynamics analysis. Firstly, a finite element model of the fuel tank cover is established using electrical–thermal coupling elements, and the lightning current impact simulation is carried out under given electrical boundary conditions and thermal boundary conditions. On one hand, the ablation criterion is determined by the Joule heating effect and the sublimation temperature of materials. The thermal damage of composite materials subjected to transient high currents is obtained through transient thermal analysis. On the other hand, special implosion elements are selected according to the temperature distribution obtained from the electrical–thermal coupling analysis. The original composite material model in the implosion region needs to be replaced with a new material model described by the high-explosive material model and the JWL equation of state. The von Mises stress distribution and pressure distribution on the structure after implosion are discussed in detail. The results show that concave pits are formed near the implosion zone. Unlike the thermal damage morphology defined by the ablation criterion, the implosion effect makes the damage distribution deviate from the initial fiber direction of each layer. The implosion dynamic method reveals the internal damage and pit and bulge phenomenon around the lightning attachment area to a certain extent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yue et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: