Analyzes ignition risks in fuel tanks from tungsten fragment impacts, suggesting safe design strategies.
Fuel tanks are critical yet vulnerable components in military platforms such as aircraft and ground vehicles, and high-velocity fragment impacts may trigger ignition and pose severe hazards. In realistic combat scenarios, fragments can enter the tank from random directions and follow distinct in-tank trajectories. Four representative impact paths are considered: ullage-only motion, ullage-to-fuel transition, fuel-to-ullage transition, and fuel-only motion. To establish an ignition prediction model that explicitly accounts for path effects, a series of ballistic impact experiments were conducted using spherical tungsten-alloy fragments of three different masses. The experiments reveal a clear path-dependent ordering of ignition thresholds. For a given fragment mass, the minimum impact velocity for ignition increases from the ullage-only path to the ullage-to-fuel, fuel-to-ullage, and fuel-only paths. High-speed imaging further identifies two dominant ignition modes: internal flash ignition and external ignition driven by fuel spray and subsequent atomization. Based on the data, path-conditional ignition probability functions are obtained, and combined with geometry-based path-hit probabilities to estimate ignition risk under random incidence. At a fixed fill ratio, the ignition probability increases with specific kinetic energy and exhibits a double-sigmoid trend with a quasi-plateau in the intermediate energy range between two fitted thresholds. These findings provide experimental evidence and a practical modeling framework for ignition assessment of fuel tanks under diverse fragment impact paths.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: