This article examines how digital feminism informs perceptions of intersectionality and allyship, indicating deeper societal implications.
This article examines how popular intersectional allyship discourses in contemporary digital feminism align with the neoliberal ethos of self-actualizing encouraged by the capitalist social media platforms on which these discourses circulate – and how this ethos materializes in feminists’ subjectivities through “the perfect.” Drawing on interviews with German-speaking feminists about their perceptions of and affective engagements with intersectionality and allyship discourses in digital feminism, I demonstrate that these discourses converge in producing “the perfect intersectional feminist.” Unpacking this theoretical figure, my analysis elucidates its three key tenets in line with neoliberal subjectivity – self-competition, self-improvement, and individualized responsibility – and how these reproduce ideals of perfect white middle-class femininity. My analysis further highlights how the perfect intersectional feminist is conditioned by the judgment-enticing design of social media platforms, enabling not only self- but also peer surveillance, which produces intra-feminist callouts, as well as (self-)competition, exhaustion, insecurity, and anxiety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katrin Schindel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: