Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study compares efficacy and safety of cisplatin versus carboplatin in recurrent head and neck cancer, indicating carboplatin may be safer.
The KEYNOTE-048 trial established pembrolizumab plus platinum and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as the standard first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). In the present study, the efficacy and safety of cisplatin and carboplatin in combination with pembrolizumab were compared using real-world data. In this retrospective study, 76 patients with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab plus 5-FU and either cisplatin (n = 41) or carboplatin (n = 35) were analysed. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and the incidence of grade ≥ 3 haematological and grade ≥ 2 non-haematological adverse events. The median PFS was 4.1 months with cisplatin and 7.1 months with carboplatin (p = 0.58). The median OS values were 14.8 and 20.7 months, respectively (p = 0.88). The ORR values were similar (34.1% vs. 34.3%, p = 0.99). Grade ≥ 3 haematological adverse events were more frequent with cisplatin than with carboplatin (87.8% vs. 48.6%, p < 0.01), as were grade ≥ 2 non-haematological adverse events (97.6% vs. 54.3%, p < 0.01). Cisplatin did not demonstrate a significant advantage over carboplatin in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR, but was associated with higher toxicity pembrolizumab-based therapy for R/M HNSCC. These findings suggest that carboplatin may represent a reasonable alternative in combination with pembrolizumab.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshida et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: