Randomized trial demonstrates a new method for composite integer detection, highlighting its effectiveness without false positives for primes.
We study a clean positional framework for detecting composite integers directly fromtheir decimal expansions. The method uses only two mechanisms: prefix-suffix cuts andborder-center decompositions. Its logical core is elementary: if a nontrivial divisor is sharedby the visible positional blocks of a decomposition, then it divides the whole integer. Norevealer multipliers, wheel reduction, or square elimination are used in the main framework.The main contribution is methodological rather than theorem-centric. We prove theelementary positional compositeness criteria and then test them computationally up to 108.In the tested range, the clean positional filter detects 81.292489% of composite integers whileproducing no false positives among primes. Moreover, across ten consecutive blocks of length10^7, the observed composite detection rate remains confined to the interval 80.293465% –82.130177%, with no visible downward trend up to 108.The paper does not claim a characterization of primality, nor an efficiency advantage overclassical methods. Rather, it isolates a direct internal-divisibility observable of compositenessand shows that this observable has strong large-scale empirical coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ricardo Adonis Caraccioli Abrego (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: