Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Global systematic review analyzes digital safeguarding of intangible cultural heritage, highlighting effectiveness and ethical governance.
This study is a global systematic review structured under PRISMA-P and PRISMA 2020 protocols. The design consists of a three-phase methodological workflow: literature identification through automated searches in international databases, independent title and abstract screening, and full-text eligibility assessment. The evidence synthesis is organized around four analytical dimensions: effectiveness, ethical governance, cultural rights, and community participation. All selection, data extraction, and quality assessment processes are performed in duplicate by two independent reviewers. Discrepancies are resolved through consensus or the intervention of a third senior researcher.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bedón-Suárez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: