Systematic review examines falls-prevention exercise effects on balance and mobility after stroke, indicating potential benefits.
ObjectiveTo determine the effect of falls-prevention exercise compared with nothing, sham or another exercise intervention on reducing falls after stroke. To also determine the effect of falls-prevention exercise on balance, mobility and quality of life.Data sourcesSearches were conducted from inception to December 2025 on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus and PEDro databases according to predefined search terms with details provided in supplementary materials.Review methodsRandomised trials were included if the intervention targeted falls and the primary outcome was the rate of falls or the number of people experiencing one or more falls. Other outcomes of interest were balance, mobility and quality of life. Methodological quality was rated with the PEDro scale. Two researchers independently extracted data, which was synthesised by meta-analysis.ResultsThree trials (n = 677) were included in the review. Exercise trended towards a lower rate of falls compared to no/sham intervention (IRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.15, p = 0.29) with uncertainty in the estimate (confidence interval includes the possibility of no effect). Exercise did not reduce the number of individuals experiencing one or more falls (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.18, p = 0.84). There was a trend towards improved balance (MD 0.49 steps in the Step Test, 95% CI -0.11 to 1.08, p = 0.11) and exercise did improve mobility a small amount (MD 0.04 m/s preferred walking speed, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.07, p < 0.01). No trials compared two exercise interventions.ConclusionThere is a suggestion that exercise can reduce the rate of falls after stroke but does not affect the number of individuals falling.RegistrationPROSPERO CRD42024520272.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scrivener et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: