Why the study?
Cardiac conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker implantation remain a frequent complication after TAVR, creating a need for advanced strategies to control conduction defects as TAVR expands to younger populations.
Does ECG-synchronized CTA evaluation of the aortic root predict and mitigate the risk of conduction abnormalities requiring pacemaker implantation after TAVR?
Does ECG-synchronized CTA evaluation of the aortic root predict and mitigate the risk of conduction abnormalities requiring pacemaker implantation after TAVR?
Pre-procedural CTA and computational modeling offer a promising strategy to predict and mitigate the risk of conduction abnormalities and pacemaker need following TAVR.
May reduce post-TAVR pacemaker needs via CTA modeling; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is preferred therapy for elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and increasingly used in younger patient populations with good safety and efficacy outcomes. However, cardiac conduction abnormalities remain a frequent complication after TAVR ranging from relative benign interventriculair conduction delays to prognostically relevant left bundle branch block and complete atrio-ventricular (AV) block requiring permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). Although clinical, procedural and electrocardiographic factors have been identified as predictors of this complication, there is a need for advanced strategies to control the burden of conduction defects particularly as TAVR shifts towards younger populations. This state of the art review highlights the value of ECG-synchronized computed tomographic angiography (CTA) evaluation of the aortic root to better understand and manage conduction problems post-TAVR. An update on CTA derived anatomic features related to conduction issues is provided and complemented with computational framework modelling. This CTA-derived 3-dimensional anatomical reconstruction tool generates patient-specific TAVR simulations enabling operators to adapt procedural strategy and implantation technique to mitigate conduction abnormality risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verhemel et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: