Why the study?
There is no unanimous opinion regarding the predictors and risk groups for the no-reflow phenomenon, hindering risk prediction and investigation of preventative methods in STEMI patients.
What are the predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
What are the predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction?
This review highlights the current understanding and challenges in identifying predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon in STEMI patients, including the use of intracoronary imaging.
Highlights diagnostic challenges in no-reflow prediction; leaves open standardized OCT/IVUS algorithms and prospective validation in STEMI.
Despite the fact that the phenomenon of unrecovered coronary blood flow (no-reflow) has long been known, there is still no unanimous opinion about the predictors and, accordingly, the risk groups for its occurrence. This prevents predicting the further course of the disease and investigating the effectiveness of therapeutic and surgical methods for preventing the consequences of reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, which in turn worsens the postoperative and long-term prognosis in this group of patients. We used the search engines E-library, Google Scholar and Pubmed to search for studies on this issue. The article presents and analyzes research data covering the predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon. The difficulties in identifying them are also described, the issue of a diagnostic approach ans sampling for research is raised. A review of studies dedicated to the identification of predictors of the no-reflow phenomenon using optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound is given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Хубулава et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: