Key result
No-reflow after PTCA for acute MI predicts ~425% higher long-term cardiac death risk versus reflow.
Why the study?
Although angiographic no-reflow predicts poor left ventricular recovery and early survival after acute myocardial infarction, its long-term prognostic importance remained to be elucidated.
Population
120 consecutive patients with first AMI treated by PTCA without flow-restricting lesions
Comparison
No-reflow (n = 30) vs reflow (TIMI-3, n = 90)
Design
Observational cohort study
Follow-up
5.8 +/- 1.2 years
Authors
Loading...
Prompts intensified long-term monitoring after no-reflow during PTCA for AMI; leaves open efficacy of interventions targeting microvascular dysfunction.
Cohort (n=120)
Effect estimate: RR 5.25 (95% CI 1.85 to 14.9)
p-value: p=0.002
Morishima et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in first acute myocardial infarction (n=120). Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon vs. reflow (TIMI-3) was evaluated on long-term cardiac death (RR 5.25, 95% CI 1.85 to 14.9, p=0.002). Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon after PTCA for acute myocardial infarction independently predicted long-term cardiac death (RR 5.25; 95% CI 1.85 to 14.9; p=0.002) compared to reflow.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: