Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
October 1, 1978AnesthesiologyOpen Access

ASA Physical Status Classifications

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

How consistent is the use of the ASA Physical Status Classification among anesthesiologists?

Population

255 anesthesiologists (out of 304 surveyed)

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

WOWilliam D. OwensLinköping UniversityJFJames A. FeltsWashington University in St. LouisESEdward L. SpitznagelWashington University in St. Louis

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Substantial ASA PS inter-rater variability persists; leaves open whether standardization can improve reliability across settings.

Structured PICO

How consistent is the use of the ASA Physical Status Classification among anesthesiologists?

P
Population
255 anesthesiologists (out of 304 surveyed)
I
Intervention
Questionnaire to classify ten hypothetical patients using the ASA Physical Status Classification
O
Outcome
Consistency of use of the ASA Physical Status Classification

The ASA Physical Status Classification is useful but lacks scientific precision, with significant variability in its application among anesthesiologists.

Cite This Study

Owens et al. (1978) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eedf080fb71af24d311668https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-197810000-00003
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share