Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
April 18, 2006HeartOpen Access

Accuracy and impact of risk assessment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

PBP BrindleSt George's HospitalABAndrew D BeswickUniversity of BristolTFTom FaheyUniversity College Dublin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Brindle et al. (2006) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eedff2b65c86b636037e6chttps://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.087932
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evaluation of computer based clinical decision support system and risk chart for management of hypertension in primary care: randomised controlled trial2000 · 279 citations
  2. 2European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice Third Joint Task Force of European and other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of eight societies and by invited experts)2003 · 2,256 citations
  3. 3Cardiovascular disease risk profiles1991 · 2,181 citations
  4. 4Predictive accuracy of the Framingham coronary risk score in British men:prospective cohort study2003 · 529 citations