PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Migration background, oral hygiene behavior and oral health literacy: findings based on a quota-based sample

GAGhazal AarabiUniversität HamburgBLBerit LieskeUniversität HamburgTMTjore ModelUniversität Hamburg

Key Points

  • This research aims to examine oral hygiene behavior and health literacy in the German population, focusing on those with migration backgrounds.
  • Data was drawn from a quota-based sample of 5,000 individuals aged 18–74 years in Germany.
  • Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the impact of migration background on oral hygiene behavior and health literacy.
  • 35.5% of individuals reported not using an electric toothbrush; 28.1% did not use a manual toothbrush.
  • Having a migration background was linked to lower odds of electric toothbrush use (OR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66–0.95) and shorter brushing duration (OR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43–0.69).
  • 76.4% of respondents reported good oral health literacy.

Abstract

Aim To describe oral hygiene behavior and oral health literacy in the general adult German population (also stratified by migration background) and to identify the association of migration background with such outcomes. Methods Data from the general adult German population aged 18–74 years was used (quota-based sample representative in terms of age, gender, and federal state). The analytic sample equaled 5,000 individuals, with mean age of 47 years, 51% being female, and 11% had a migration background. Common questions were employed to measure oral hygiene behavior, oral health literacy and migration background. Multiple logistic regressions were used to explore the association of migration background with oral hygiene behavior and oral health literacy. Results A significant proportion reported not using oral hygiene products, with 35.5% not using an electric toothbrush (not using manual toothbrush: 28.1%), 59.4% not using fluoride gel, and 27.7% not using interdental cleaning aids. Additionally, 14.1% brushed their teeth for less than two minutes and 76.4% reported having at least good oral health literacy. Depending on migration background, some outcomes significantly varied. Adjusted multiple logistic regressions showed that having a migration background (compared to not having a migration background) was significantly associated with lower odds of using an electric toothbrush (OR = 0.79, 95% CI:0.66–0.95) and duration of tooth brushing (OR = 0.54, 95% CI:0.43–0.69). Conclusion Data on oral health, use of different oral hygiene products, and oral health literacy among adults with migration background is limited. Our analysis adds to this knowledge and helps identify gaps and needs in this population to improve preventive measures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Aarabi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefc23fede9185760d353dhttps://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2026.1791168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper