Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores thermoelectric performance in cotton textiles, suggesting potential for low-power applications.
The present study reports the functionalisation of cotton woven (CO) textiles with polyurethane (PU)-based coatings containing graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) and PEDOT:PSS, aiming to develop thermoelectric textiles. A fixed concentration (5 % (w/v)) of GNPs is combined with five contents of PEDOT:PSS (0-2.5 % (w/v)) to tailor the thermoelectric performance. Structural, morphological and thermal analyses confirm uniform coating penetration into the textile and a good dispersion of the GNPs, as evidenced by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. The incorporation of the GNPs enables electrical percolation, therefore yielding the larger electrical conductivity ( σ ), of 0.62 ± 0.18 S/m (when no PEDOT:PSS is present), while the addition of PEDOT:PSS reshapes charge transfer through energy-filtering effects, increasing the Seebeck coefficient ( S ) (to a maximum value of 18.3 ± 1.1 μV/K, at 2 % (w/v) PEDOT:PSS), despite a reduction in σ . All functional coated samples exhibit p-type thermoelectric behaviour and maintain small thermal conductivity ( κ ), with values ranging from 0.008 to 0.015 W/(m.K). The highest figure of merit ( ZT ) of (3.4 ± 0.9) × 10 -6 at 300 K was obtained for the formulation containing 2.5 % (w/v) PEDOT:PSS, reflecting a better balance between σ , S and κ . Although the thermoelectric performance remains modest, the results demonstrate the potential of GNP/PEDOT:PSS-PU-coated textiles for low-power energy harvesting or thermal sensing applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Durão et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: