Evaluates synthetic CT image generation for dose accuracy in pelvic radiotherapy, indicating potential for improved treatment.
Background and Purpose: Synthetic CT (sCT) images generated from cone-beam (CB)CT images have shown improved image quality over CBCT images.This work evaluated a deep learning (DL)-based sCT model with the potential to facilitate accurate adaptive radiotherapy for pelvis patients.Materials and Methods: A DL-based cycle-Generative Adversarial Network (cycleGAN) model, incorporating a novel loss function to enhance structural image similarity, was used to generate sCT images from CBCT images acquired on a conventional c-arm Linac during intensity-modulated radiotherapy.Auto-segmentation accuracy for 10 pelvic structures was assessed compared to physiciandrawn contours using Dice similarity coefficients (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and mean distance-toagreement (MDA).CT numbers for pelvic organs-at-risk were compared between sCT and planning CT (refCT).Dose, calculated using a Monte Carlo algorithm, was compared using relative dose differences to the gross tumor volume (GTV) for D 98%, D 50% , and D 2% between sCT and recalculated refCT, alongside 3Dglobal gamma analysis with 3%/3mm, 2%/2mm, and 1%/2mm criteria. Results:The sCTs demonstrated high auto-segmentation accuracy with DSC>0.8 and MDA<2 mm, except for the small bowel and colon.CT number differences were within published tolerances to achieve less than 1% dose difference excepting structures with substantial gas variations compared to the refCT.The mean dose difference to the GTV was 0.3%0.6across D 98% , D 50%, and D 2% .3D-gamma passing rates were 972% for the most restrictive criterion used, 1%/2mm.Conclusions: The cycleGAN-based CBCT-to-sCT model generated high-quality sCT images that may be directly utilized for image segmentation and dose calculation to advance adaptive radiotherapy on conventional Linacs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anbumani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: