Key result
Persistent right venous valve with PFO shunting is linked to transient neonatal desaturation reaching ~80%.
Why the study?
Although persistent right venous valve (PRVV) can cause severe neonatal cyanosis requiring surgery, its clinical significance in otherwise healthy term neonates remains poorly defined.
Observational (n=10)
No
Transient oxygen desaturation in term neonates with PRVV is generally benign, suggesting that unnecessary respiratory evaluations can be avoided.
Background: Persistent right venous valve (PRVV), a remnant of the fetal right valve of the sinus venosus, may facilitate right-to-left atrial shunting through the patent foramen ovale (PFO). Although PRVV has been reported to cause severe neonatal cyanosis requiring surgical intervention, its clinical significance in otherwise healthy term neonates remains poorly defined. Methods: values during hospitalization were assessed. Results: values remained high (95-100%) in all cases. These desaturation episodes occurred predominantly during sleep and were frequently synchronized with inspiration, suggesting a circulatory rather than respiratory mechanism. Although some neonates experienced transient desaturation reaching as low as 80%, none developed sustained hypoxemia, required prolonged oxygen supplementation, or underwent additional respiratory investigations or therapeutic interventions. All neonates remained clinically stable throughout hospitalization. Conclusion: decreases and avoid unnecessary respiratory evaluations in selected neonates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mino et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Persistent right venous valve with right-to-left atrial shunting (n=10). Persistent right venous valve (PRVV) was evaluated on Minimum, median, and maximum SpO2 values during hospitalization. Persistent right venous valve with patent foramen ovale-related right-to-left atrial shunting caused transient, self-limiting oxygen desaturation reaching as low as 80% in term neonates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: