Key result
DAPT appears safe and effective for preventing thromboembolic complications after pediatric neurointerventional surgery.
Why the study?
Does dual antiplatelet therapy prevent thrombotic events safely in pediatric patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures?
Observational (n=15)
No
Does dual antiplatelet therapy prevent thrombotic events safely in pediatric patients undergoing neurointerventional procedures?
DAPT appears well-tolerated and effective for preventing thromboembolic complications in pediatric neurointerventional procedures, though prospective studies are needed to establish optimal dosing.
Hypothesis-generating for DAPT in pediatric neurointerventional surgery; prospective trials needed before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Pediatric neurointerventional procedures are uncommon and management protocols are often extrapolated from adult data. In adults, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the standard of care to reduce thromboembolic events following placement of a stent or flow diverter. There is limited evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of DAPT in the pediatric population and its use remains off-label. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DAPT in children undergoing neurointerventional procedures. METHODS: This single-center retrospective case series included pediatric patients (age ≤ 18 years) who underwent a neurointerventional procedure and received DAPT during a continuous period between 2016 and 2024. Data on patient demographics, procedural details, antiplatelet regimens, and clinical outcomes were collected. The primary outcomes were the incidence of thrombotic events (e.g., stroke and in-stent thrombosis) and major bleeding complications. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (10 male, median age 12 years) were included in this analysis. Indications included arterial aneurysms (n = 8) and venous sinus stenosis (n = 6). All patients received DAPT and aspirin, while 13 received clopidogrel and 4 received ticagrelor (2 patients received both). No thromboembolic complications, strokes, or device thromboses occurred (0/15, 95% CI 0.0%-21.8%). One patient (1/15, 95% CI 0.2%-31.9%) experienced a significant retroperitoneal hemorrhage, which was likely related to vascular access and was medically managed. No other major adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series, DAPT was well tolerated and appeared effective in preventing thromboembolic complications in pediatric patients after neurointerventional surgery. These findings support the use of DAPT in this population, although further prospective studies are needed to establish evidence-based guidelines for optimal dosing, timing, and duration of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tumberger et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Pediatric neurointerventional procedures (n=15). Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was evaluated on Incidence of thrombotic events (e.g., stroke and in-stent thrombosis) and major bleeding complications. Dual antiplatelet therapy in pediatric neurointerventional procedures resulted in 0% thromboembolic complications (95% CI 0.0%-21.8%) and 1 major bleeding event (6.7%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: