Key result
Combining patient pharmacogenetics with drug response monitoring for P2Y12 inhibitor therapy is predictive and cost-effective in achieving target platelet inhibition and reducing adverse events.
Why the study?
Selection, timing, and dosing of DAPT can be challenging given significant inter- and intraindividual response variations to P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing intravascular stent or flow diverter placement.
Does a precision medicine approach using genotyping and phenotyping for P2Y12 inhibitor therapy reduce thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing neuroendovascular surgery?
Does a precision medicine approach using genotyping and phenotyping for P2Y12 inhibitor therapy reduce thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in patients undergoing neuroendovascular surgery?
A precision medicine approach utilizing genotyping and phenotyping for P2Y12 inhibitors may optimize drug response and reduce adverse events in neuroendovascular surgery.
May support genotype-phenotype P2Y12 monitoring in neuroendovascular cases; leaves open outcome benefits pending prospective trials.
INTRODUCTION: Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), primarily the combination of aspirin with a P2Y12 inhibitor, in patients undergoing intravascular stent or flow diverter placement remains the primary strategy to reduce device-related thromboembolic complications. However, selection, timing, and dosing of DAPT is critical and can be challenging given the existing significant inter- and intraindividual response variations to P2Y12 inhibitors. METHODS: Assessment of indexed, peer-reviewed literature from 2000 to 2020 in interventional cardiology and neuroendovascular therapeutics with critical, peer-reviewed appraisal and extraction of evidence and strategies to utilize DAPT in cardio- and neurovascular patients with endoluminal devices. RESULTS: Both geno- and phenotyping for DAPT are rapidly and conveniently available as point-of-care testing at a favorable cost-benefit ratio. Furthermore, systematic inclusion of a quantifying clinical risk score combined with an operator-linked, technical risk assessment for potential adverse events allows a more precise and individualized approach to new P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The latest evidence, primarily obtained from cardiovascular intervention trials, supports that combining patient pharmacogenetics with drug response monitoring, as part of an individually tailored, precision medicine approach, is both predictive and cost-effective in achieving and maintaining individual target platelet inhibition levels. Indirect evidence supports that this gain in optimizing drug responses translates to reducing main adverse events and overall treatment costs in patients undergoing DAPT after intracranial stent or flow diverting treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosengart et al. (2021) conducted a review in Neuroendovascular surgery requiring dual antiplatelet therapy. Genotype- and phenotype-guided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy vs. Standard unguided P2Y12 inhibitor therapy was evaluated. Combining patient pharmacogenetics with drug response monitoring for P2Y12 inhibitor therapy is predictive and cost-effective in achieving target platelet inhibition and reducing adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: