Why the study?
Protocols for antiplatelet use in neurointerventional procedures are scarce and practice varies, complicated by differences among agents in administration, dosing, onset, efficacy, and complications.
This review summarizes the existing literature on the use, characteristics, and risks of P2Y12 inhibitors in neurointerventional procedures.
Variability in neurointerventional antiplatelet use warrants individualized caution; leaves open standardized, evidence-based protocols.
The use of antiplatelets is widespread in clinical practice. However, for neurointerventional procedures, protocols for antiplatelet use are scarce and practice varies between individuals and institutions. This is further complicated by the quantity of antiplatelet agents which differ in route of administration, dosage, onset of action, efficacy and ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. Clarifying the individual characteristics for each antiplatelet agent, and their associated risks, will increasingly become relevant as the practice of mechanical thrombectomy, stenting, coiling and flow diversion procedures grows. The aim of this review is to summarize the existing literature for the use of P2Y12 inhibitors in neurointerventional procedures, examine the quality of the evidence, and highlight areas in need of further research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borchert et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: