PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 20268 citationsOpen Access

Stress-Testing the Preferred SO(10)-Compatible QDL Completion: Failure Modes, Alternatives, and Robustness

View Full Paper
JBJames D. Bourassa

Key Points

  • This paper aims to assess the robustness of the QDL–SO10–1 benchmark, identifying its strengths and potential weaknesses.
  • Conducted a robustness audit of QDL–SO10–1 features against various theoretical scenarios.
  • Evaluated alternative simple-group completions and their implications for benchmark stability.
  • Analyzed proton-decay scaling and its connection to neutrino and baryogenesis perturbations.
  • Identified robust features of the QDL–SO10–1 benchmark with clear failure conditions.
  • Demonstrated that certain calculations could revise or falsify benchmark predictions.
  • Outlined collider expectations and remnant conditions under different scenarios.

Abstract

This record is Paper #3 in the QDL–SO10–1 benchmark sequence. It stress-tests the fixed SO(10)-compatible QDL benchmark introduced in Paper #1 and developed phenomenologically in Paper #2. The paper classifies which features of QDL–SO10–1 are robust, which are conditional, and which observations or calculations would force revision or falsification. It evaluates the benchmark against alternative simple-group completions, threshold sensitivity, proton-decay scaling, neutrino/baryogenesis perturbations, collider/remnant expectations, and explicit failure modes. This is a robustness-audit paper, not a complete global SO(10) scan, not an operator-level proton-decay calculation, not a completed leptogenesis computation, and not a final proof of uniqueness. Its purpose is to delimit the stability of the QDL–SO10–1 benchmark and make its failure conditions explicit.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James D. Bourassa (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd15fede9185760d3d4dhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19762215
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper