PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 20268 citationsOpen Access

Low-Energy Phenomenology Closure of the Preferred SO(10)-Compatible QDL Completion

View Full Paper
JBJames D. Bourassa

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop low-energy phenomenology closure based on the SO(10)-compatible QDL benchmark established in previous work.
  • Builds on the fixed SO(10)-compatible QDL benchmark established in Paper #1.
  • Extracts indirect low-energy signatures related to standard model physics.
  • Provides criteria for explicit support or falsification of the benchmark's claims.
  • Identifies several low-energy signatures including visible physics and small neutrinoless double beta benchmark.
  • Highlights compatibility with baryogenesis and proton decay exposure.
  • Discusses collider null expectations and their implications for future research.

Abstract

This record is Paper #2 in the QDL–SO10–1 benchmark sequence. It develops the low-energy phenomenology closure of the fixed SO(10)-compatible QDL benchmark introduced in Paper #1. The paper extracts the benchmark’s indirect low-energy signatures: Standard-Model-like visible physics, high-scale singlet-neutrino remnant structure, small neutrinoless-double-beta benchmark, baryogenesis-facing compatibility, proton-decay exposure, collider null expectations, and explicit support/falsification criteria. It is a consequence and traceability paper, not a new ultraviolet benchmark or a complete global scan. All low-energy claims are traced to the fixed QDL–SO10–1 benchmark defined in Paper #1: Bourassa, J. D. (2026). An SO(10)-Compatible QDL Grand-Unification Benchmark with Two-Loop Running, Threshold Matching, and Proton-Decay Exposure (Version 1.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19742963.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

James D. Bourassa (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edad274a46254e215b4c82https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19744877
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Executable Closure of the QDL–SO10–1 Benchmark: Integrated Gauge Running, Scalar Thresholds, Proton Decay, Flavor, Leptogenesis, and Historical Positioning2026
  2. 2Executable Closure of the QDL–SO10–1 Benchmark: Integrated Gauge Running, Scalar Thresholds, Proton Decay, Flavor, Leptogenesis, and Historical Positioning2026
  3. 3An SO(10)-Compatible QDL Grand-Unification Benchmark with Two-Loop Running, Threshold Matching, and Proton-Decay Exposure2026
  4. 4An SO(10)-Compatible QDL Grand-Unification Benchmark with Two-Loop Running, Threshold Matching, and Proton-Decay Exposure2026 · 8 citations
  5. 5Stress-Testing the Preferred SO(10)-Compatible QDL Completion: Failure Modes, Alternatives, and Robustness2026 · 8 citations