Randomized trial evaluates improved cognitive achievement with augmented reality in medical students during rotation, suggesting effective learning enhancement.
Limited and variable case exposure during pediatric neurology rotations may leave some clinically important presentations underrepresented within a single rotation window. We evaluated whether augmented reality–supported learning environments (ARLEs) integrated into the rotation improve medical students’ cognitive achievement beyond the standard curriculum. In this prospective cluster-randomized controlled pretest-posttest study, 102 students were allocated by 4 rotation subgroups (clusters) to an intervention group (standard curriculum plus ARLEs delivered via a mobile application; n = 51) or a control group (standard curriculum only; n = 51). Achievement was assessed using a 30-item multiple-choice achievement test and analyzed with a 2 × 2 mixed-design analysis of variance and Welch t test (α=.05). Baseline knowledge did not differ between groups ( P = .405). Both groups improved, but posttest scores were higher in the intervention group, t (90.9) = 5.65, P < .001, d = 1.12. The time × group interaction was significant and strong, F (1, 100) = 33.38, P < .001, partial η 2 =0.250, indicating greater gains with ARLEs. ARLEs integrated into the pediatric neurology rotation may provide a potentially useful short-term adjunct to, rather than a replacement for, face-to-face instruction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çokyaman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: