Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines how order of iTBS and perceptual learning affects sensory eye dominance, suggesting a causal role of visual cortex.
Sensory eye dominance (SED) reflects imbalanced treatment of the two eyes’ inputs by the brain. Both V1-targeted intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) and dichoptic perceptual learning (PL) can reduce SED, implicating primary visual cortex (V1); however, how these interventions interact and whether they interact in an order-dependent manner remains unknown. Forty-four healthy control (HC) adults completed three daily sessions receiving either iTBS followed by PL (iTBS–PL) or PL followed by iTBS (PL–iTBS). We indexed observers’ SED and motion discrimination thresholds before and after each session. SED decreased across sessions only for observers who received iTBS before PL. Motion thresholds were reduced similarly in both groups. These findings reveal an order-dependent facilitatory interaction between the two paradigms and support a causal, initiating role of V1 state in PL-driven SED plasticity rather than its implication as a byproduct of learning. • iTBS and PL likely entail shared, V1-centered mechanisms • iTBS-PL primes V1 excitability, amplifying PL-driven SED reweighting • Findings suggest that V1 state influences subsequent PL-driven SED plasticity • Motion sensitivity improves regardless of the PL/iTBS sequence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wáng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: