PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering0 citations

Assessing driver subjectivity in a vehicle dynamic simulator through a deep learning-based framework

View Full Paper
CRCádmo Augusto RodriguesPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas GeraisJLJánes LandrePontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais

Key Points

  • This research investigates how drivers' subjective assessments of vehicle dynamics relate to objective metrics using deep learning techniques.
  • Utilized a dynamic simulator with 9 degrees of freedom involving 25 human drivers.
  • Employed deep neural networks (DNN) to analyze data from vehicle simulations and driver feedback.
  • Standardized vehicle evaluations to assess subjective versus objective correlations.
  • Achieved approximately 90% accuracy in standardized vehicle evaluations across different driver experience levels.
  • Demonstrated the ability to classify vehicles independently of driver subjectivity.
  • Significantly reduced vehicle development time and costs.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and data science techniques are integral to modern Engineering research, and this also holds for Automotive Engineering (AE). In this context, given the growing need to analyze relatively extensive datasets obtained from vehicle instrumentation and simulator use, this study aims to explore the relationship between drivers’ subjective assessments (SA) regarding vehicle dynamic behavior and its objective metrics (OM). To make this feasible, resources such as deep neural networks (DNN), virtual car models developed in VI-CarRealTime (VI-CRT) software, and 25 human drivers using a dynamic simulator with 9 degrees of freedom, the VI-Grade Driver in Motion (DiM) 150; were needed. By leveraging data from both virtual simulations and human drivers, the DNN demonstrated its ability to standardize vehicle evaluations across individuals with varying experience levels, ensuring a more consistent mapping between objective metrics and subjective assessments, and presenting satisfactory accuracy of around 90%. While one of the key outcomes of this paper is the capacity to evaluate the vehicle independently of driver subjectivity, another crucial one is the system’s ability to rely on less experienced drivers for vehicle classification. Also, another contribution is the significant reduction in vehicle development time and costs. Overall, this work advances vehicle evaluation by harmonizing subjective and objective assessments, fostering innovation in Automotive Engineering.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rodrigues et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefdb5fede9185760d4697https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070261443615
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper