Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines linear scales' limitations in assessing tree safety, suggesting dynamic approaches imply better evaluation methods.
This article examines the limitations of linear assessment scales currently used in arboricultural practice to evaluate the mechanical state of trees, and proposes a paradigm shift towards dynamic scales and clinical predictive scores. Drawing on Nassim Taleb's concept of antifragility, the author demonstrates that trees are not fragile systems but antifragile ones: they improve their structural resistance in response to mechanical stress, particularly through thigmomorphogenesis. This challenges the validity of linear grading scales, which fail to account for the non-linear, complex responses of living systems. The article argues that combined multiparameter approaches, such as clinical predictive rules already widely used in medicine, offer a more accurate and reproducible method for assessing tree safety factors. Published in ARB Magazine, Issue 202, Autumn 2023, The Arboricultural Association. Mots-clés : linear scales antifragility tree mechanical assessment clinical predictive rules safety factorstructural diagnosis thigmomorphogenesis tree risk assessment clinical arboriculture dynamic scale
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Philippe Trouillet (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: