Abstract Setting priorities is crucial for optimising research in resource-constrained environments, so we identify higher education (HE) research priorities at one regional Australian university. Employing constructivism, we conducted a three-round modified-Delphi with an expert panel (n = 64) using online questionnaires. Analysis included descriptive statistics (quantitative items), and content/theme analysis (qualitative). We collected 37 panellist-identified priorities (Round 1): the top three were AI in HE, how best to teach innovatively, and equity in HE. Across all three rounds, 48 priorities were considered with 31 achieving high importance and consensus: the top three were student engagement, how to teach creative/critical thinking skills, and how technology impacts HE. Key rationales underlying panellists’ priorities were conducting research to improve student learning, workforce preparedness, and aligning with institutional values. Findings align partly with international priority-setting exercises, but also reveal novel insights specific to the regional context. Although institution-specific, findings offer broader relevance and a replicable methodology for other HE institutions identifying research priorities.
Tafazoli et al. (Sat,) studied this question.