Randomized trial shows combined HIIT and probiotics upregulate FXR and PPAR-γ in diabetic rats, suggesting new treatment avenues.
This study investigated the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) and a multi-strain probiotic mixture, on the intestinal expression of FXR and PPAR-γ in a rat model of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Forty male Wistar rats were randomly assigned to five groups (n=8): Healthy Control (HC), Diabetic Control (DC), Diabetic+HIIT (DH), Diabetic+Probiotic (DP), and Diabetic+HIIT+Probiotic (DHP). T2DM was induced via a single intraperitoneal injection of nicotinamide (95 mg/kg) followed by streptozotocin (STZ, 55 mg/kg). The HIIT protocol was performed on a rodent treadmill for 8 weeks (5 sessions/week). The probiotic mixture (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus reuteri; 1×10¹⁰ CFU/mL each) was administered daily via oral gavage. Diabetes induction significantly downregulated the intestinal expression of both FXR and PPAR-γ compared to healthy controls (p<0.001). HIIT and probiotic interventions, individually, significantly increased the expression of both nuclear receptors compared to the diabetic control group (p<0.001). Notably, the combined HIIT and probiotic intervention (DHP) produced the highest expression levels of FXR and PPAR-γ, which were significantly greater than either intervention alone (p<0.01) and restored FXR expression to levels comparable to healthy controls. Both HIIT and multi-strain probiotic supplementation effectively upregulate the intestinal expression of FXR and PPAR-γ in diabetic rats, with the combination exerting a synergistic effect. These findings identify a novel mechanism by which lifestyle interventions may restore intestinal metabolic function and inter-organ communication in T2DM, highlighting the therapeutic potential of targeting the gut through combined exercise and probiotic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jahandarlashaki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: