Pilot study develops a machine learning model to predict disease flares in axial spondyloarthritis, suggesting implications for patient care.
Objective Flares of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are common yet unpredictable. We aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning (ML) model to forecast flares 3, 6, 9 and 12 months ahead using routinely collected electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of 282 axSpA patients (January 2018 to May 2024) in our centre. Flares were defined as a ≥ 2.1 unit rise in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), ≥ 0.9 unit rise in axSpA Disease Activity Score and clinician confirmed flare. Ninety-eight candidate predictors spanning demographics, patient-reported outcomes, laboratory indices and comorbidities were aggregated into time-series windows. We applied Light Gradient-Boosting Machine (LGBM) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting to forecast the risk of flare. Model interpretability was assessed with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results Of 282 patients, 100 (35.5%) experienced at least one flare. Our LGBM model demonstrated key 3-month metrics of: accuracy 0.846 (95% CI 0.545–0.980), sensitivity 0.833 (95% CI 0.358–0.995), specificity 0.857 (95% CI 0.421–0.996) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.845 (95% CI 0.615–1.000). Performance decreased modestly at 12 months, AUROC 0.773 (95% CI 0.562–0.984). Top SHAP contributors included comorbidity burden, BASDAI, CRP deviation, lymphocyte count, age and deprivation index. Individual-level SHAP plots enabled personalised risk profiles. Conclusion This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of explainable ML models to predict axSpA flares up to 1 year in advance using real-world EHR data. Embedding the algorithm in electronic records could triage high-risk patients to earlier review and therapy adjustment. This approach offers a novel strategy to inform treat-to-target care pathways and support future integration into digital rheumatology systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: