Why the study?
Despite the common adoption of percutaneous LV assist devices in HR-PCI, there are no clear guideline recommendations for indication due to limited published data.
Does percutaneous mechanical circulatory support improve outcomes in patients with poor left-ventricular function undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions?
Does percutaneous mechanical circulatory support improve outcomes in patients with poor left-ventricular function undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions?
Decisions to use percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in high-risk PCI should be individualized and guided by a multidisciplinary team due to the lack of clear guideline recommendations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Protected PCI decisions require MDT risk-benefit assessment; limited data leaves optimal use and outcomes open for prospective trials.
Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) is increasingly used in patients with poor left-ventricular (LV) function undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCIs). These patients are often in critical condition and not suitable candidates for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. For the definition of HR-PCI, there is a growing consensus that multiple factors must be considered to define the complexity of PCI. These include haemodynamic status, left-ventricular ejection fraction, clinical characteristics, and concomitant diseases, as well as the complexity of the coronary anatomy/lesions. Although haemodynamic support by percutaneous LV assist devices is commonly adopted in HR-PCI (protected PCI), there are no clear guideline recommendations for indication due to limited published data. Therefore, decisions to use a nonsurgical, minimally invasive procedure in HR-PCI patients should be based on a risk-benefit assessment by a multidisciplinary team. Here, the current evidence and indications for protected PCI will be discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leick et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: