Does preoperative diastolic dysfunction worsen early post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing elective CABG?
Preoperative assessment of diastolic dysfunction using transesophageal echocardiography identifies CABG patients at high risk for prolonged intubation, higher inotropic support, and increased ICU stay.
Objectives: In cardiac surgery, diastolic dysfunction (DD) is becoming a more widely acknowledged factor of unfavorable post-operative outcomes. The objective of the prospective study was to assess how DD affected the early post-operative course in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Material and Methods: This single-center prospective observational study included 75 patients who underwent elective CABG. Diastolic function (DF) was assessed preoperatively using transesophageal echocardiography, based on a simplified algorithm, with supplementary parameters including tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity and medial e’ velocity. Patients were categorized into normal and abnormal DF groups, and various intraoperative and post-operative parameters were recorded and compared. Results: Out of 75 patients, 59 (78.67%) had abnormal DF. These patients were significantly older (mean age 64.47 ± 7.67 years) compared to those with normal function (55.56 ± 7.02 years, P < 0.001). Echocardiographic parameters, including septal e’, lateral e’, average e’, and E/e’ ratio, showed significant impairment in the abnormal DF group ( P < 0.001). Prolonged intubation time (16.84 ± 2.98 vs. 6.07 ± 1.23 h), higher vasoactive-inotropic scores (5.87 ± 4.68 vs. 2.40 ± 2.32), and prolonged intensive care unit stay (3.37 ± 1.48 vs. 2.06 ± 0.56 days) were found in DF patients ( P < 0.001). Complications such as pleural effusion and atrial fibrillation were more common in the abnormal DF group. Conclusion: DD is prevalent among CABG patients and associated with adverse post-operative outcomes, including prolonged intubation, higher inotropic support, and increased complications. Routine pre-operative assessment of DF can help identify high-risk patients and tailor perioperative management.
Sharma et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: