Demonstrates dimensional validation of patient-specific cranial implants, indicating high fidelity in complex structures.
Introduction Patient-specific cranial implants fabricated using powder bed fusion technologies require rigorous dimensional validation to ensure reliable digital-to-physical translation, particularly when complex architectures are employed. However, multistage quantitative evaluations that distinguish deviations introduced during additive manufacturing and post-processing remain limited. Methods A multistage dimensional accuracy assessment workflow based on high-resolution micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) was applied to a representative patient-specific cranial implant featuring a Voronoi-based macrostructure fabricated in Ti–6Al–4 V using Electron Beam Melting (EBM). The implant was digitized in the unpolished and surface-finished conditions. Three-dimensional surface models were compared with the original virtual design using full-field deviation analysis to quantify geometric variations attributable to manufacturing and post-processing. Results After the finishing procedure, the surface roughness decreased significantly, with Ra reduced from 19.41 µm to 1.43 µm and Rz from 83.28 µm to 6.31 µm. A comparison between the virtual model and the unpolished implant revealed dimensional deviations predominantly within −0.20 to +0.35 mm, with localized positive deviations up to +0.55 mm associated with powder adhesion and support interaction. Following post-processing, deviations shifted predominantly toward negative values owing to controlled material removal, with a mean deviation of −0.05 mm and a maximum negative deviation of −0.18 mm. Surface finishing reduced the maximum positive deviation from +0.55 mm to +0.04 mm, corresponding to an approximate 93% reduction in positive dimensional deviation. The overall topology and structural continuity of the Voronoi-based architecture were preserved throughout manufacturing and finishing. Discussion This proof-of-concept study demonstrated the feasibility of a multistage micro-CT-based workflow for the dimensional validation of complex patient-specific cranial implants fabricated by EBM. The proposed methodology enables differentiation between manufacturing- and post-processing-induced deviations and supports reproducible quality assessment of additively manufactured cranial implant geometries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rotar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: